Big News: 3 Powerful New Features Coming Soon

VerifyTreatment VerifyTX Logo
Confident revenue start with better data
Revenue Cycle

Waystar vs Availity: Full Comparison, Key Differences & Best Alternative

January 28, 2026
Written by
Luis Perdomo

Table Of Contents

Got Product Questions? Let's Talk!
From new inquiries to current customer support, we’re standing by to assist you.

Quick Summary

Waystar and Availity both streamline revenue cycle tasks that would otherwise drain hours, including eligibility checks, claims, denials, and payer follow-ups. But they solve these problems differently. Waystar functions as a full RCM engine powered by automation and AI, while Availity operates as a massive connectivity hub with broad payer access. For behavioral health providers, neither fully addresses carve-outs or rapid admissions the way VerifyTreatment does.

Waystar vs Availity: Which Revenue Cycle Tool Should You Choose?

If tools like Waystar and Availity didn’t exist, you’d spend hours every week chasing eligibility, calling payers, correcting preventable denials, and watching cash flow slow to a crawl. Both platforms exist to take that burden off your team but they’re not built the same.

Waystar leans toward automation, AI, and deeper revenue-cycle control, while Availity centers on connectivity — a massive network linking providers and payers. And depending on your size and workflow, one may fit naturally, while the other may feel heavier than you need.

If you’re comparing both to see which actually makes your operations easier, this breakdown gives you the clarity you’re looking for.

Why Listen to Us?

We work with admissions and RCM teams every day — the same teams trying to choose between tools like Waystar and Availity. VerifyTreatment was built to solve the specific problems they kept running into: slow verifications, missing behavioral health details, coverage changes, and denials that could have been prevented. 

One facility, Foundations Recovery Network, recovered $10,000+ in monthly revenue simply by closing these gaps with VerifyTreatment.

Waystar vs. Availity: Key Differences

Waystar Acts Like a Full RCM Engine, Availity Acts Like a Massive Connectivity Hub

Waystar is the all-in-one control center for revenue cycle teams that want fewer denials, cleaner claims, and a workflow that catches mistakes before payers ever see them. Its Claims Manager scrubs, edits, and predicts denials before submission, reducing backend rework. Its Eligibility + Coverage Detection normalizes payer data so you see accurate benefits in one place, without jumping between portals. And tools like AltitudeAI and Rules Manager automate corrections, surface missing information, and accelerate reimbursement.

Availity, meanwhile, is built for sheer connectivity. Its real-time EDI network lets you check eligibility, claims, and remits from one login, while payer-spaces and APIs plug you into a massive nationwide network. As one reviewer put it, Availity brings “claim status and eligibility from multiple payers… in one space, with one login.”

Waystar Leans on AI to Reduce Work, Availity Leans on Its Network to Reduce Friction

Even though user reviews rarely talk about “AI” directly, you can clearly see Waystar’s strategy: automate the revenue cycle so your team does less manual cleanup. Its AltitudeAI™ suite is built around three pillars — AltitudeCreate™, which generates cleaner claim content and documentation; AltitudeAssist™, which automates corrections and flags missing data; and AltitudePredict™, which forecasts denials before they happen. Together, these tools reduce the grunt work that normally slows down RCM teams and improve first-pass yield.

Availity, on the other hand, also uses automation and predictive editing but not at the same depth or positioning as Waystar. Instead, Availity’s real value comes from its network: its payer connections, its real-time EDI rails, its payer-spaces integrations, and its APIs that reduce back-and-forth friction. Where Waystar tries to replace manual RCM work, Availity tries to simplify the path between you and the payer.

Waystar Streamlines Claim Submission, Availity Struggles With Proof-of-Submission Issues

Waystar users consistently highlight how easy it is to submit, track, and correct claims. Its Claims Manager scrubs errors before submission, surfaces payer-specific edits, and gives you clear visibility into how a claim moved through the system. Several users even call it a “life saver” because it catches problems early and makes it easy to find proof of timely filing.

Availity’s experience is more mixed. While many users appreciate the ability to submit claims across countless payers, others report recurring issues with proof of submission, missing claim history, or claim status showing “no claim on file” even after payment. One biller put it plainly:

“Anything denied for timely filing that went through Availity had to be written off because I couldn’t get proof of the submission.”

If defensible claim submission matters in your workflow, this difference is hard to ignore.

Waystar Offers Richer Eligibility Normalization, Availity Offers Broader Eligibility Access

Waystar focuses on depth of eligibility data. Its Eligibility + Coverage Detection engine normalizes messy payer information, fills in missing details, and automatically searches for additional active coverage when something looks off. For many users, this means fewer surprises after admission and fewer denials tied to inaccurate benefit data.

Availity, meanwhile, emphasizes reach. Its dual-sided network gives you eligibility access to an enormous range of payers — often faster than hopping between portals. Many users say Availity is their go-to “quick check” tool because almost every major plan can be verified from a single login.

Waystar’s Support Is Either “Amazing” or “The Worst,” While Availity’s Is Either “Helpful” or “They Never Answer”

Support sentiment for both platforms is extremely polarized but in very different ways.

With Waystar, users tend to fall into two camps. Some rave about “great customer service,” fast help, and easy access to support reps. Others describe the experience as “the worst I’ve ever had,” citing unreturned tickets, unhelpful reps, and frustration strong enough that multiple reviewers said they dread calling Waystar. The gap depends heavily on the account, the rep, and how complex your setup is.

Availity gets the same split — just for different reasons. Many users say support is “excellent,” especially for quick eligibility or claim checks. But a large group complains that Availity simply doesn’t answer, doesn’t clarify pricing or plan tiers, and often redirects users back to the payer when something goes wrong. One reddit user trying to transition from paper billing summed it up: “I can’t get anyone on the phone. I just want clear answers.”

What is Waystar?

Waystar is a full revenue cycle automation platform designed to help healthcare organizations submit cleaner claims, prevent denials, accelerate payment, and reduce the manual workload that slows down billing teams. It combines clearinghouse functionality with AI-driven workflows, eligibility intelligence, denial prediction, prior authorization automation, and deep analytics — making it one of the most robust RCM engines on the market.

Key Features

  • Claims Manager: advanced scrubbing, editing, and denial prediction before submission
  • Eligibility + Coverage Detection: normalized eligibility results and automatic detection of missing/secondary coverage
  • AltitudeAI™ Suite
    • AltitudeCreate™ for AI-generated claim/appeal content
    • AltitudeAssist™ for automated corrections and workflow guidance
    • AltitudePredict™ for predicting denials and outcomes
  • Authorization Manager: AI-driven authorization requirements, submission, and status
  • Charge Integrity: finds missing charges and DRG anomalies
  • Denial & Appeal Management: automated appeals, payer forms, and tracking
  • Payment Posting + Reconciliation: auto-match remits and payments
  • Analytics Dashboard:  revenue cycle KPIs, trend insights, and benchmarking
  • Coverage Detection + Charity Screening: instantly finds active benefits and evaluates financial assistance eligibility

Pricing

Waystar pricing is not public, but reviewers commonly describe it as more expensive than alternatives, with:

  • 1-year contracts
  • Per-provider billing that some users say was incorrectly charged
  • Additional fees for certain claim types or workflows (e.g., submitting medical records/PWK)

Users consistently advise: “Read the contract closely especially renewal terms and provider counts.”

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Extremely feature-rich; acts as a full RCM engine, not just a clearinghouse
  • Strong claim scrubbing and denial prevention tools
  • Deep eligibility normalization improves accuracy
  • Automation significantly reduces manual RCM workload
  • Many users praise the interface as clean and easy to navigate
  • Some report excellent onboarding and customer service

Cons

  • Price is higher than competitors
  • Contract terms can be rigid; cancellation can be difficult
  • Support quality is inconsistent — some rave, others strongly criticize
  • Implementation may be heavy, especially for smaller teams
  • Occasional payer-level limitations (e.g., missing benefit nuances)
  • Users report frustration when issues require support escalation

What is Availity?

source

Availity is a nationwide healthcare connectivity and clearinghouse platform that acts as the central gateway between providers, payers, and HIT systems. Instead of operating like a full RCM engine, Availity focuses on real-time eligibility, claims submission, claim status, remits, and payer-specific workflows—all from a single login. It’s known for its massive payer reach, dual-sided network, and the ability to integrate administrative and clinical data into key transactions.

Key Features

  • Real-Time Eligibility & Benefits (270/271): check coverage across hundreds of payers instantly
  • Claims Submission (837) + Claim Status (276): submit claims and monitor status in one portal
  • Remittance Processing (835): retrieve ERA files and reconcile payments
  • Payer-Spaces: payer-specific tools, updates, forms, and resources without leaving Availity
  • API Connectivity: eligibility, claim status, member ID cards, care reminders, and more
  • Authorization & Referral Tools (278): submit or track auth requirements depending on payer setup
  • Revenue Cycle Workflows (Essentials Pro): pre-service, post-service, and post-adjudication automations
  • EDI Clearinghouse Services: nationwide connectivity for practices, billing companies, and HIT vendors
  • Dual-Sided Network Intelligence: unifies administrative + clinical insights where supported

Pricing

Availity’s pricing structure is not transparent, and this is one of the most common user complaints. What’s known from reviews and industry patterns:

  • A free portal tier exists for basic claim entry and eligibility checks
  • Clearinghouse/EDI services often require paid tiers, but pricing is unclear and varies
  • Some payers require additional fees or separate enrollment
  • Users report difficulty getting clear answers about what is included in their current plan
  • Smaller practices praise it as “cheaper than most,” while others say its tiers are confusing

Here’s a screenshot of a reddit user sharing their frustration:

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Massive payer connectivity; broadest eligibility access among major clearinghouses
  • One login for eligibility, claims, remits, and status across many plans
  • Payer-spaces simplify workflows for large payers like BCBS
  • Affordable entry point for small practices or limited claim volume
  • Generally user-friendly interface for eligibility and claim tracking
  • Many reviewers call it “essential” for quick verification

Cons

  • Proof-of-submission issues for some users (especially affecting timely filing disputes)
  • Customer support can be slow or difficult to reach
  • Eligibility detail varies widely by payer; results can feel incomplete
  • Clearinghouse pricing and tiers are opaque
  • Missing or inconsistent claim history has caused write-offs for some practices
  • Limited BH-specific insights (e.g., carve-outs, coverage nuances)

Best Alternative to Waystar & Availity: VerifyTreatment

If you look closely at how these platforms work, you will see that Waystar focuses heavily on automation, but it does not reliably expose behavioral health carve-outs or the benefit details admissions teams depend on. Availity, on the other hand, provides strong connectivity to many payers, but when it comes to behavioral health nuance and real coverage clarity, it often leaves teams without the information they need to make the right call at intake.

VerifyTreatment bridges both gaps. It delivers behavioral-health-specific eligibility, real-time coverage monitoring, deep exclusion checks, and instant insight into authorization requirements. It gives admissions and billing teams the clarity they need upfront, instead of discovering problems after the patient is already in care.

Key Features

  • Real-Time Eligibility (Behavioral Health-Focused): Returns full mental health + SUD benefits, auth requirements, and carve-out routing from 1,700+ payers.
  • Carve-Out Detection: Automatically flags when BH benefits are managed by Magellan, Beacon, Optum, etc.—something general tools frequently miss.
  • Batch Verification + VOB Monitoring: Re-checks your entire census daily, weekly, or monthly to catch lapsed policies before they become $7K–$10K write-offs.
  • Customizable Payer Alerts: Track quirks, high-risk plans, prior issues, and internal notes across your whole team.
  • Team Collaboration: HIPAA-compliant messaging, tagging, mobile notifications, and shared VOB results.
  • Webform Intake Integration: Verify insurance automatically the moment a lead submits your admissions form.
  • Client Dashboard: See verifications, team activity, payer issues, and admission trends in real time.
  • Exportable Records: Download VOBs instantly for billing handoff or compliance.

Pricing

VerifyTreatment keeps pricing simple and contract-light:

  • Month-to-month plans (no long-term commitments)
  • Flat, predictable pricing per facility team, not per provider
  • No hidden clearinghouse fees
  • Free mobile app included

Most importantly, you don’t get penalized for growth. Adding more verifications or team members doesn’t trigger surprise billing.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Designed specifically for behavioral health and SUD workflows
  • Best carve-out detection among the three platforms
  • Fastest verification process (seconds, not minutes or hours)
  • Batch monitoring prevents revenue loss mid-treatment
  • Eliminates silos between admissions, clinical, and billing
  • Extremely easy to learn; almost no implementation burden
  • Teams consistently report fewer surprises and more confident admissions
  • Mobile app gives staff real-time results anywhere

Cons

  • Not a full RCM suite like Waystar (by design)
  • Not a nationwide connectivity hub like Availity
  • Built for BH providers — may be too specialized for general medical practices
  • Doesn’t replace clearinghouse-level functions (claim submission, ERAs, etc.)

Waystar vs. Availity vs. VerifyTreatment: Feature Comparison

Feature / CapabilityWaystarAvailityVerifyTreatment
Primary PurposeFull RCM automation platform (claims, denials, eligibility, payments)National connectivity hub + clearinghouseBehavioral health–specific eligibility intelligence
Best ForMid-to-large practices, health systems, multi-provider RCM teamsSmall to large practices needing multi-payer accessBehavioral health, SUD, MH providers focused on admissions + revenue protection
Eligibility DetailDeep, normalized eligibility + coverage detectionBroad payer eligibility access; detail varies by payerBH-specific benefit detail, carve-outs, auth requirements
Carve-Out DetectionLimited; misses BH carve-outsLimited; dependent on payer integrationIndustry-leading carve-out detection (Beacon, Magellan, Optum, etc.)
Authorization ToolsAuthorization Manager + AI-driven requirements and trackingAuth submission/status depending on payerFlags whether auth is required before admission
Claims ManagementAdvanced scrubbing, edits, AI predictionsStandard edits; mixed user experience; proof-of-submission issuesNot a claim-submission tool (pairs with your existing RCM/clearinghouse)
Denial ManagementAutomated appeals, AI letter generationBasic workflows depending on tierPrevents denials upfront by catching coverage issues early
Batch VerificationNot a core featureNot offeredFull census checks; continuous policy monitoring
Team CollaborationInside certain modules; variesLimited; mostly admin rolesBuilt-in HIPAA-compliant messaging, tagging, shared VOBs
AI CapabilitiesStrong: AltitudeAI™, AltitudeAssist™, AltitudePredict™Some predictive editing; less emphasizedFocused intelligence for BH workflows

Why Do People Choose VerifyTreatment?

1. It’s Built Specifically for Behavioral Health

Waystar and Availity serve the entire healthcare ecosystem. VerifyTreatment, on the other hand, is built for behavioral health, SUD, and mental health admissions. Meaning that it catches the carve-outs, exclusions, and level-of-care nuances the big RCM tools routinely miss.

2. It Prevents Denials Before They Happen

Most platforms focus on correcting denials after the fact. VerifyTreatment flags missing authorizations, benefit limitations, lapsed coverage, and BH carve-outs before you admit a patient, saving facilities $7,000–$10,000 per avoidable denial.

3. It Helps You Admit Faster and Convert More Patients

Slow verification costs admissions. Providers choose VerifyTreatment because it delivers full VOB results in seconds, offers a mobile app for on-the-go checks, and lets teams make fast decisions during the first phone call.

4. It Keeps Your Admissions, Billing, and Clinical Teams Aligned

Instead of siloed information, VerifyTreatment gives every department the same real-time data.
Built-in HIPAA-compliant messaging, patient tagging, and shared VOB reports eliminate the “admissions said one thing, billing got another” problem entirely.

5. It Monitors Coverage Continuously, Not Just Once

Other platforms stop at the first eligibility check. VerifyTreatment’s batch verification + ongoing policy monitoring alerts your team when coverage lapses, when benefits change, or when a payer switches mid-care, protecting revenue every single day of treatment.

Where Waystar and Availity Stop, VerifyTreatment Begins

Waystar and Availity are strong platforms, but they are built for general medical workflows, large networks, and broad revenue cycle operations. If your organization lives and breathes behavioral health, they will not always catch the details that matter most: carve-outs, exclusions, authorization nuances, and level-of-care differences that determine whether a patient is admitted or whether you get paid.

VerifyTreatment fills that gap. It gives behavioral health providers the speed, accuracy, team alignment, and revenue protection that traditional RCM tools were never designed for. If you want to reduce denials, admit patients faster, and stop losing revenue to preventable mistakes, VerifyTreatment is the purpose-built solution created for exactly that.

Get started with VerifyTreatment Here.

Related post:
VerifyTreatment simplifies insurance verification for behavioral health and healthcare providers nationwide.
Samantha Gobert
Senior Account Executive

Samantha is a dynamic marketing professional dedicated to making a difference in the behavioral health industry through her work at VerifyTreatment. With a strong background in digital marketing and brand advocacy, she helps elevate the platform’s presence by fostering authentic connections with treatment centers and healthcare providers. Her expertise in content creation and community engagement ensures that VerifyTreatment’s value is communicated effectively, helping centers streamline operations and improve patient care. Samantha’s focus on building trust and driving awareness positions VerifyTreatment as a key resource in the healthcare landscape.

Nicole Staples
Customer Success Representative

Nicole is a versatile healthcare professional with a Bachelor’s degree in Health Administration and a solid background in managing healthcare systems and operations. Her experience spans healthcare management, compliance, and regulations, making her adept at navigating complex healthcare environments. In addition to her administrative expertise, Nicole holds certifications in Functional Nutrition and Personal Training, giving her a well-rounded perspective on health and wellness. She is committed to using her skills to improve healthcare settings and ensure effective, patient-centered care.

Tara Perdomo
Brand Engagement Manager

Tara is a dedicated leader who leverages her Master's degree in Information Technology (Florida Tech) and deep company knowledge (since 2018) to drive our community awareness. She is the central figure for managing social engagement and ensuring the community is immediately and effectively informed of all new product launches and company updates.

JoAnn Kelly
Business Development Consultant

JoAnn has a strong background in the mental health and substance abuse industry, with expertise in billing, coding, facility credentialing, and contracting. She is passionate about team education and public speaking, always striving to make a positive impact. With a solid foundation in accounting, JoAnn also holds an Associate of Arts in Biblical Studies from Liberty University, blending her professional skills with her personal values.

Melanie Hernadez
Customer Success Supervisor

For 11+ years, Melanie has been dedicated to helping clients access quality mental health care, with a special focus on grief, loss, and substance abuse. With expertise in healthcare, community outreach, patient advocacy, and leadership development, Melanie is passionate about making a positive impact in the lives of others.

Jordan Sheffield
Senior Account Executive

Jordan is a dedicated advocate for behavioral health and is passionate about improving sales strategies and business processes. With a focus on helping businesses, particularly in healthcare, Jordan believes that streamlining operations is a way to positively impact more people indirectly. A strong leader, both personally and professionally, Jordan is committed to making a difference in the world by doing good business and serving a higher purpose.